Time to crack open that Barley water and dust off those giant autographed balls as the ATP tennis tour gets into top gear ready for the summer. But Britain’s hopes are once again pinned on the young shoulders of brave Scot Andy Murray. But over the years, his shoulders have gotten heavy with the hope as he remains Britain’s best player, and will be for the foreseeable future.
So what does the future hold for British tennis? Can we continue to have one player occupying the top 100 rankings of the world? Is the sport entering a dark age or is there new light on the horizon?
Gone are the days of straw hats, strawberries and pimms, people travelling from far and wide to ascend the world renowned Henman hill in the drizzle. Each disciple with the gut feeling that it will all be over by the quarters and longing for the glory days of Perry and Wade. Then, through the Scottish mist we saw this bum fluffed frizzy haired teen that could perhaps reignite our dying flame.
The formidably miserable scot has no doubt got the fire and desire which we haven’t seen for years to challenge the goliaths of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic; only delivering one piece of grand slam silver ware which was fantastic, but has got British tennis fans purring for more. Maybe the pressure of being the only male British player is proving to be too much. Out of the world’s top 100 players, he is the only one from the shores of Britain. That should be ringing alarm bells at the Lawn Tennis Association (LTA). The Women’s game is also not in good condition, although it does paint a better picture than their male counter-parts. At the end of the 2011 season there were three players sitting in the top 100, the highest ranked at number 50. The doubles are faring better however this does not get as much media coverage and is not as popular.
Over the years a gapping chasm has appeared between the amateur and elite games with most of the blame being placed on the costs involved with tennis. Court fee’s, coach fee’s, club memberships, equipment costs and travel all adds up when money is tight. So why is the British influence in the world rankings weak, is it simply that the rest of the world is much better or something more?
Rachael Raymond, sport teacher at Bexhill College, has been pledging relentlessly for tennis courts to introduce and build the interest in tennis amongst students. Finally last year her hard work paid off. However building tennis courts is an expensive business and with education cuts, the college could not afford to employ a professional company, as a result the court began to deteriorate quickly. This she says is one of the biggest issues with British tennis. Poor facilities at grassroots and amateur level are putting people off. The way tennis is valued within Britain she feels is a major hindrance on our production of world beaters.
“Coming from a tennis academy, I was amazed to see how few schools have tennis in PE due to costs and lack of coaches. When professional tennis players finish their career they tend to go into coaching professionals rather than teaching tennis to the masses.” She points out that the world of tennis then enters a cycle: players don’t get the opportunity to start tennis at school therefore don’t gain the knowledge and skills; they don’t turn professional therefore not transferring their skills into coaching at schools. “It is essential children get into tennis at a young age so the skills taught have time to develop.”
She highlights 4 key areas that she feels need addressing at grassroots level these include being more accessible, not just being a ‘rich’ sport, creating quality courts for the general public, more coaching programmes for communities to get people involved in the sport and for local clubs/institutions to link with schools thus opening the market wider.
But Sam Bruce lecturer at North Herts/Herts Uni and tennis coach at Gosling Sports Park in Hertfordshire has a different outlook to the future. “The standard of 6-9 year olds is the highest I have seen in 3 years! I’m confident on hitting the right area’s now.” He is strongly against the argument that cost is the biggest contributor to putting players off. Sam believes that the national body for sport the Lawn Tennis Association (LTA) is working on the situation, but as with anything in life, it takes time and people must be patient for results. “The LTA have been stable and had the same faces for many years now. It means they can see out their ideas rather than new people coming in and changing things.”
The LTA recently conducted a study of players across the country in attempt to gauge what the public wants, to help them play more tennis and get more players involved. One issue flagged up by the study was players complaining of a lack of playing partner’s. This is gradually being over-come by a ‘social network’ where players communicate with other players in their area for a game. However the key point arising from the study was the players’ response to the prime blame of the past, cost. Players believed there was no issue of cost within tennis. The biggest issues that came out of the study were area’s to play and parents not having the time to play due to work/ family commitments. However, is there an argument that those who were surveyed were already in the tennis community and maybe have a bit more cash to splash and therefore do not think it is an issue? But on the issue of time, Gosling Sports Park has stepped up to the plate to help out. “We have a children’s area/programme where we look after the kids offering the parents more time to play tennis.”
For young players showing promise there is plenty of financial roots that can fund their talent from sponsorships, ACA, LTA funding and parental support. However that’s only if you are good enough to be acknowledged for the funds, what about average Joe who just wants to get a little better at tennis? That can come at a cost between £25-£35 per hour and having a coach for the day could cost £100-£150!
So relating to the question ‘what does the future hold for British tennis?’ this still seems to be inconclusive, we’ve seen two ends of the spectrum and both provided their opposing views. The world is on the brink of another economic meltdown, families are looking to save and if they can offer their child the chances to play sport and keep active for free they will take it. All sports stars have gone through those years of going down the park after school to play. But unlike sports such as football, tennis requires facilities which if aren’t kept in good condition could put many children off. Depending on where you live may also have a massive influence on the facilities available to you, compare the arguments from our coaches, one says they have only just had a coach come in from outside the college once a week, the other says they send coaches out to schools a few times a week.
But like many modern sports, tennis is adapting in the way it teaches. The evolution of mini tennis is believed to be the way to get tennis to the masses and kick-start success once again. It will be a while until we discover the results, but I believe this is the way to generate mass interest in the sport and produce champions!